Alix-normalized exosomal programmed death-ligand 1 analysis in urine enables precision monitoring of urothelial cancer.

Anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Ab-based therapies have demonstrated potential for treating metastatic urothelial cancer with high PD-L1 expression. Urinary exosomes are promising biomarkers for liquid biopsy, but urine's high variability requires normalization for accurate analysis. This study proposes using the PD-L1/Alix ratio to normalize exosomal PD-L1 signal intensity with Alix, an internal exosomal protein less susceptible to heterogeneity concerns than surface protein markers. Extracellular vesicles were isolated using ExoDisc and characterized using various methods, including ExoView to analyze tetraspanins, PD-L1, and Alix on individual exosomes. On-disc ELISA was used to evaluate PD-L1 and Alix-normalized PD-L1 in 15 urothelial cancer patients during the initial treatment cycle with Tecentriq. Results showed that Alix signal range was relatively uniform, whereas tetraspanin marker intensity varied for individual exosome particles. On-disc ELISA was more reliable for detecting exosomal PD-L1 expression than standard plate ELISA-based measurement. Using exosomal Alix expression for normalization is a more reliable approach than conventional methods for monitoring patient status. Overall, the study provides a practical and reliable method for detecting exosomal PD-L1 in urine samples from patients with urothelial cancer.

MCM5 urine expression (ADXBLADDER) is a reliable biomarker of high-risk non- muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence: A prospective matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Mini Chromosome Maintenance 5 (MCM5) is considered as a urinary biomarker of bladder cancer. ADXBLADDER is a commercially available test to detect MCM5 antibodies. OBJECTIVE: External validation of ADXBLADDER test as a urinary biomarker of histopathologically confirmed non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrence. METHODS: The study enrolled 119 consecutive patients with a history of NMIBC and 37 healthy volunteers matched as controls. Single, full-void urine samples were collected from patients before cystoscopy ± TUR. To measure MCM5 expression, Arquer Diagnostics ADXBLADDER test was used. The study protocol was registered within the clinical trials database (NCT03796299). RESULTS: Among patients with NMIBC history, recurrence was diagnosed in 83 patients (69.7%). ADXBLADDER demonstrated sensitivity of 73.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 62.7%-82.6%), specificity of 33.3% (95% CI 18.6% to 51%), overall negative predictive value (NPV) of 35.3% (95% CI 23.3% to 49.5%) and overall positive predictive value of 71.8% (95% CI 66.1% to 76.8%) for detecting recurrence. In a control group, false positive ADXBLADDER results were noticed in 18 patients (48.6%). The sensitivity and NPV were the highest in invasive tumors (100% and 100%, respectively) and in high-grade recurrences (81.8% and 94.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ADXBLADDER has a moderate sensitivity and poor specificity in detecting NMIBC recurrence. However, it properly diagnoses patients with T1+ stage recurrence or high-grade tumors.

Predictive value of MCM5 (ADXBLADDER) analysis in urine of men evaluated for the initial diagnosis of bladder cancer: A comparative prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To compare predictive value of MCM5 to urinary cytology (UC) for the primary diagnosis of bladder cancer (BCa). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 91 patients who presented macroscopic hematuria or persistent lower urinary tract symptoms at our institution. Single voided mid-stream urine specimens were collected for UC and MCM5 (ADXBLADDER; Arquer Diagnostics Ltd, Sunderland, United Kingdom) assessment. Cystoscopy was used as confirmatory test, and positive cases underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor with histopathological evaluation. RESULTS: Forty cases (43.9%) showed a positive cystoscopy for BCa. Histology was obtained in 37 cases: 16 (43.2%) high-grade (HG) and 21 (56.8%) low-grade (LG) transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). UC had a sensitivity of 62.5%, specificity of 86.3%, PPV of 78.1% and NPV of 74.6%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MCM5 were 60.0%, 88.2%, 80.0% and 73.8%, respectively. According to tumor grade, MCM5 and UC showed a sensitivity of 47.6% and 52.4% in LG, and 87.5% and 75.0%, respectively, in HG TCC. False-positive rates were 11.8% and 13.7% of negative cases for BCa with MCM5 and UC test, whereas false-negative results were found in 40.0% and 37.5% of BCa cases, respectively. The combination of the two tests showed a sensitivity of 71.4% in LG, and 93.8% in HG TCC. CONCLUSION: In the present analysis, MCM5 showed lower sensitivity than UC in predicting BCa primary diagnosis. According to tumor grade, MCM5 showed a higher sensitivity in the detection of HG BCa compared to UC, although values were not significantly different.

Diagnostic Accuracy of MCM5 for the Detection of Recurrence in Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Followup: A Blinded, Prospective Cohort, Multicenter European Study.

PURPOSE: Detection of MCM5 containing cells in urine has been shown to be indicative of the presence of a bladder tumor on primary diagnosis. In this study we evaluate diagnostic performance of ADXBLADDER in patients undergoing cystoscopic surveillance in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter prospective blinded study was performed at 21 European centers with patients undergoing cystoscopy for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer surveillance, diagnosed in the preceding 2 years. Urine was collected from all eligible patients and ADXBLADDER-MCM5 testing was performed. Performance characteristics were calculated by comparing MCM5 results to the outcome of cystoscopy plus pathological assessment. RESULTS: Of 1,431 eligible patients enrolled 127 were diagnosed with a bladder cancer recurrence. The overall sensitivity for the ADXBLADDER-MCM5 test in detecting bladder cancer recurrence was 44.9% (95% CI 36.1-54) with a 75.6% sensitivity for nonpTaLG tumors (95% CI 59.7-87.6). Specificity was 71.1% (95% CI 68.5-73.5). The overall negative predictive value was 93% (95% CI 91.2-94.5). However, ADXBLADDER was able to rule out the presence of a nonpTaLG recurrent tumor with a negative predictive value of 99.0% (95% CI 98.2-99.5). No statistically significant differences in the performance of ADXBLADDER were observed as a result of age or sex. CONCLUSIONS: This large blinded prospective study demonstrates that in the followup of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer ADXBLADDER is able to exclude the presence of the most aggressive tumors with a negative predictive value of 99%. These results indicate that ADXBLADDER could be incorporated in the followup strategy of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Expression levels of serum vasohibin-1 and other biomarkers in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with different urinary albumin to creatinine ratios.

AIM: To determine the serum levels of vasohibin (VASH)-1 and other biomarkers in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with different urinary albumin to creatinine ratios (UACR), and correlate VASH-1 expression with the inflammation and fibrosis in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). METHODS: A total of 697 T2DM patients were stratified into four groups: N-UAlb (UACR <30 mg/g with normal blood pressure, n = 144), M-UAlb (UACR 30-300 mg/g with normal blood pressure, n = 143), L-UAlb (UACR >300 mg/g with normal blood pressure, n = 126), and L-UAlb+HP (UACR >300 mg/g with hypertension, n = 134). In addition, 150 healthy subjects were included as normal controls (NC). In addition to recording the age and duration of diabetes, the serum levels of VASH-1, silent information regulator factor 2-related enzyme 1 (sirtuin-1, SIRT1), hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF1α), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured. Clinical parameters related to UACR and VASH-1 were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation and ridge regression analysis. RESULTS: The UACR, VASH-1, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), ESR, CRP, VEGF, HIF1α, TNF-α and TGF-ß1 levels in all patient groups were significantly higher, and SIRT1 levels were lower compared to the NC group. Pearson correlation analysis showed that UACR and VASH-1 levels were positively correlated with HbA1c, ESR, CRP, VEGF, HIF1α, TNF-α and TGF-ß1, and negatively with SIRT1. Ridge regression analysis showed that every serological marker was an independent factor affecting UACR. CONCLUSION: Serum VASH-1 may be associated with the expression of renal inflammation and fibrosis-related factors, and have a potential connection with DKD.

Upregulation of NDRG1 predicts poor outcome and facilitates disease progression by influencing the EMT process in bladder cancer.

N-myc downstream regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) is an intracellular protein involved in cell differentiation and was recently reported to exert various effects in several cancers. However, its expression and role in bladder cancer remain unclear. Our study enrolled 100 bladder cancer patients to detect NDRG1 expression in tumour tissues by immunohistochemistry. Correlations between NDRG1 expression and clinical factors were analysed. An NDRG1 overexpression plasmid and NDRG1 siRNAs were transfected into bladder cancer cell lines. Cell biological behaviours were assessed by CCK-8, flow cytometry, wound healing and Transwell assays. Additionally, the influence of NDRG1 on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was investigated by western blotting and real-time PCR. NDRG1 expression in urine from bladder cancer patients was examined by ELISA. NDRG1 protein levels were significantly increased in bladder cancer patients and correlated with tumour stage (p = 0.025), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.034) and overall survival (p = 0.016). Patients with high NDRG1 expression had poorer outcomes than those with low NDRG1 expression. NDRG1 overexpression was associated with increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and decreased apoptotic cell numbers; NDRG1 knockdown resulted in the inverse effects. Moreover, upregulated NDRG1 expression was associated with downregulated Cytokeratin 7 and Claudin-1 expression and upregulated N-cad, ß-catenin and slug expression. Downregulated NDRG1 expression was associated with the inverse effects. Urine protein levels could distinguish bladder cancer patients from healthy controls, with an area under the curve of 0.909. NDRG1 promoted EMT in bladder cancer and could be an effective diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in bladder cancer patients.

Effect of pH on the isolation of urinary exosome.

PURPOSE: Urinary exosome is an ideal noninvasive, low-cost source of kidney diseases biomarkers. However, many factors effect the isolation of urine-derived exosome. The effect of pH on the yield of exosome isolation under different pH was explored. METHODS: The pH was adjusted for 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 with hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide solution. All samples were incubated for 30 min before differential ultracentrifugation. Exosome-associated protein markers TSG101, ALIX and total concentration of RNA were evaluated by Western-blotting and micro-amount ultraviolet spectrophotometer, respectively. RESULTS: A major loss of urinary exosome was received at pH 8 compared with alkali medium or control group. There was no difference whether or not added EDTA-Na2. CONCLUSIONS: Acidic environment was likely to conducive to the isolation of exosome and maintain its stability and integrity that suggest pH medium needs to be carefully considered and also provide a methodology for future separation exosome.

Ubiquilin2 as a novel marker for detection of urothelial carcinoma cells in urine.

BACKGROUND: Ubiquilin 2 (UBQLN2), an ubiquitin-related protein, is strongly expressed in urothelial carcinoma cells, in contrast to no or less expression in non-neoplastic cells; it protects cancer cells from reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced cytotoxicity. In this study, we investigated whether UBQLN2 immunostaining, using liquid-based cytology sample could improve the accuracy of cytological urine diagnosis. METHODS: Two-hundred and forty-five urinary samples, including 143 negative controls and 102 urothelial carcinomas, consisting of 42 low-grade and 60 high-grade urothelial carcinomas, were used for immunocytochemical analysis of UBQLN2. RESULTS: Urothelial carcinoma cells were positive for UBQLN2-staining, while non-neoplastic cells, including renal tubular cells and degenerative atypical cells, were negative. Interestingly, percentage of nuclear stain immunopositive for UBQLN2 was significantly higher in carcinoma cells with high grade/invasive phenotype than in those with low grade/noninvasive phenotype. UBQLN2 immunostaining had an overall sensitivity of 87.6%, specificity of 98.6%, positive predictive value of 97.8% and negative predictive value of 92.8% for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: UBQLN2 immunostaining is a practical test for urine cytology, even in samples with few cells, with slight atypia or severe degenerative changes. In addition, it allows prediction of tumor grade and stage by examining the cellular localization of UBQLN2.

Programmed cell death 6 interacting protein (PDCD6IP) and Rabenosyn-5 (ZFYVE20) are potential urinary biomarkers for upper gastrointestinal cancer.

PURPOSE: Cancer of the upper digestive tract (uGI) is a major contributor to cancer-related death worldwide. Due to a rise in occurrence, together with poor survival rates and a lack of diagnostic or prognostic clinical assays, there is a clear need to establish molecular biomarkers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Initial assessment was performed on urine samples from 60 control and 60 uGI cancer patients using MS to establish a peak pattern or fingerprint model, which was validated by a further set of 59 samples. RESULTS: We detected 86 cluster peaks by MS above frequency and detection thresholds. Statistical testing and model building resulted in a peak profiling model of five relevant peaks with 88% overall sensitivity and 91% specificity, and overall correctness of 90%. High-resolution MS of 40 samples in the 2-10 kDa range resulted in 646 identified proteins, and pattern matching identified four of the five model peaks within significant parameters, namely programmed cell death 6 interacting protein (PDCD6IP/Alix/AIP1), Rabenosyn-5 (ZFYVE20), protein S100A8, and protein S100A9, of which the first two were validated by Western blotting. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We demonstrate that MS analysis of human urine can identify lead biomarker candidates in uGI cancers, which makes this technique potentially useful in defining and consolidating biomarker patterns for uGI cancer screening.

Urinary and plasma levels of vasohibin-1 can predict renal functional deterioration in patients with renal disorders.

Vasohibin-1 (VASH-1) is a negative feedback regulator of angiogenesis, and a small vasohibin-binding protein (SVBP) serves as its secretory chaperone and contributes to its antiangiogenic effects. In the present study, we aimed to define the clinical significance of VASH-1 and SVBP in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We recruited 67 Japanese hospitalized patients with renal disorders with (n = 45) or without (n = 22) renal biopsy samples and 10 Japanese healthy controls. We evaluated the correlations between the plasma and urinary levels of VASH-1/VASH-1-SVBP complex/SVBP and the clinicopathological parameters. The plasma levels of VASH-1 were inversely correlated with age and systolic and diastolic blood pressure and positively correlated with crescent formation. Increased plasma and urinary levels of VASH-1 and VASH-1-SVBP complex were significantly correlated with worse renal outcomes. These results demonstrate an association between elevated urinary and plasma levels of VASH-1 and progressive decline of the renal function, thus suggesting a potential role for VASH-1 in predicting a worse renal prognosis in patients with renal disease, including CKD.

Diagnosis of bladder cancer by immunocytochemical detection of minichromosome maintenance protein-2 in cells retrieved from urine.

BACKGROUND: We tested the accuracy of immunocytochemistry (ICC) for minichromosome maintenance protein-2 (MCM-2) in diagnosing bladder cancer, using cells retrieved from urine. METHODS: Adequate samples were obtained from 497 patients, the majority presenting with gross haematuria (GH) or undergoing cystoscopic surveillance (CS) following previous bladder cancer. We performed an initial study of 313 patients, followed by a validation study of 184 patients. In all cases, presence/absence of bladder cancer was established by cystoscopy/biopsy. RESULTS: In the initial study, receiver operator characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.820 (P<0.0005) for the GH group and 0.821 (P<0.01) for the CS group. Optimal sensitivity/specificity were provided by threshold values of 50+ MCM-2-positive cells in GH samples and 200+ cells in CS samples, based on a minimum total cell number of 5000. Applying these thresholds to the validation data set gave 81.3% sensitivity, 76.0% specificity and 92.7% negative predictive value (NPV) in GH and 63.2% sensitivity, 89.9% specificity and 89.9% NPV in CS. Minichromosome maintenance protein-2 ICC provided clinically relevant improvements over urine cytology, with greater sensitivity in GH and greater specificity in CS (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Minichromosome maintenance protein-2 ICC is a reproducible and accurate test that is suitable for both GH and CS patient groups.

Bladder cancer diagnosis and identification of clinically significant disease by combined urinary detection of Mcm5 and nuclear matrix protein 22.

BACKGROUND: Urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer detection are constrained by inadequate sensitivity or specificity. Here we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Mcm5, a novel cell cycle biomarker of aberrant growth, alone and in combination with NMP22. METHODS: 1677 consecutive patients under investigation for urinary tract malignancy were recruited to a prospective blinded observational study. All patients underwent ultrasound, intravenous urography, cystoscopy, urine culture and cytologic analysis. An immunofluorometric assay was used to measure Mcm5 levels in urine cell sediments. NMP22 urinary levels were determined with the FDA-approved NMP22® Test Kit. RESULTS: Genito-urinary tract cancers were identified in 210/1564 (13%) patients with an Mcm5 result and in 195/1396 (14%) patients with an NMP22 result. At the assay cut-point where sensitivity and specificity were equal, the Mcm5 test detected primary and recurrent bladder cancers with 69% sensitivity (95% confidence interval = 62-75%) and 93% negative predictive value (95% CI = 92-95%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for Mcm5 was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.71-0.79) and 0.72 (95% CI = 0.67-0.77) for NMP22. Importantly, Mcm5 combined with NMP22 identified 95% (79/83; 95% CI = 88-99%) of potentially life threatening diagnoses (i.e. grade 3 or carcinoma in situ or stage ≥pT1) with high specificity (72%, 95% CI = 69-74%). CONCLUSIONS: The Mcm5 immunoassay is a non-invasive test for identifying patients with urothelial cancers with similar accuracy to the FDA-approved NMP22 ELISA Test Kit. The combination of Mcm5 plus NMP22 improves the detection of UCC and identifies 95% of clinically significant disease. Trials of a commercially developed Mcm5 assay suitable for an end-user laboratory alongside NMP22 are required to assess their potential clinical utility in improving diagnostic and surveillance care pathways.

Diagnosis of prostate cancer by detection of minichromosome maintenance 5 protein in urine sediments.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in prostate cancer detection is constrained by low sensitivity and specificity. Dysregulated expression of minichromosome maintenance (Mcm) 2-7 proteins is an early event in epithelial multistep carcinogenesis and thus MCM proteins represent powerful cancer diagnostic markers. In this study we investigate Mcm5 as a urinary biomarker for prostate cancer detection. METHODS: Urine was obtained from 88 men with prostate cancer and from two control groups negative for malignancy. A strictly normal cohort included 28 men with complete, normal investigations, no urinary calculi and serum PSA <2 ng ml(-1). An expanded control cohort comprised 331 men with a benign final diagnosis, regardless of PSA level. Urine was collected before and after prostate massage in the cancer patient cohort. An immunofluorometric assay was used to measure Mcm5 levels in urine sediments. RESULTS: The Mcm5 test detected prostate cancer with 82% sensitivity (confidence interval (CI)= 72-89%) and with a specificity ranging from 73 (CI=68-78%) to 93% (CI=76-99%). Prostate massage led to increased Mcm5 signals compared with pre-massage samples (median 3440 (interquartile range (IQR) 2280 to 5220) vs 2360 (IQR <1800 to 4360); P=0.009), and was associated with significantly increased diagnostic sensitivity (82 vs 60%; P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary Mcm5 detection seems to be a simple, accurate and noninvasive method for identifying patients with prostate cancer. Large-scale prospective trials are now required to evaluate this test in diagnosis and screening.

Exosomes in urine: who would have thought...?

Normal urine contains thousands of proteins, largely due to the presence of 'exosomes,' tiny vesicles secreted into the urine by renal epithelial cells. These exosomes, demonstrated by Keller and colleagues to be also retrievable from amniotic fluid, offer great promise for future disease biomarker discovery studies.

Diagnosis of genito-urinary tract cancer by detection of minichromosome maintenance 5 protein in urine sediments.

BACKGROUND: Because cystoscopy is invasive and expensive and urine cytology has low sensitivity, alternative methods for detecting bladder cancer are sought. Minichromosome maintenance (Mcm) proteins have been used as diagnostic markers for cervical cancer. We investigated whether one Mcm protein, Mcm5, can be used to detect urothelial cancer cells in urine sediments. METHODS: We used two monoclonal antibodies against His-tagged human Mcm5 (amino acids 367-582) in an immunofluorometric assay to measure Mcm5 levels in cells in the urine of 353 patients who presented with hematuria or lower urinary tract symptoms or who were undergoing follow-up cystoscopy for urothelial neoplasia. Urine samples were also subjected to routine cytologic analysis. Patients underwent upper urinary tract imaging and cystoscopy within 12 hours of producing the urine sample. Data were analyzed by comparing areas under a nonparametric receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and by McNemar's test and Fisher's exact test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: At the assay cut point where the false-negative and false-positive rates were the same, the Mcm5 test detected primary and recurrent bladder cancers with 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 77% to 94%) sensitivity and 87% (95% CI = 83% to 91%) specificity. At the cut point where the specificities of urine cytology and the Mcm5 test were equal (97%, 95% CI = 95% to 99%), the Mcm5 test was statistically significantly (P<.001) more sensitive than urine cytology, 73% (95% CI = 61% to 83%) versus 48% (95% CI = 35% to 60%). At the lower detection limit of the Mcm5 test, sensitivity was highest, 92% (95% CI = 83% to 97%) and specificity was 78% (95% CI = 72% to 83%). Patients with prostate cancer had higher levels of Mcm5 in their urine sediments than did men without malignancy (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of Mcm5 in urine sediments are highly predictive of bladder cancer.

Immunoassay for urothelial cancers that detects DNA replication protein Mcm5 in urine.

Cancer-screening tests for internal organs are severely constrained by low specificity or sensitivity, cost, and morbidity. We report a non-invasive immunofluorometric assay for detection of urothelial cancers based on ectopic expression of the DNA replication protein Mcm5.